We've just updated several vendor evaluations in our Enterprise Collaboration and Social Software technology stream, including

This month, we've updated our evaluations of three Web CMS vendors:

I sometimes warn that a vendor's content management system is well suited to "simple" scenarios, but not necessarily a good fit for "more complex" cases. That's a bit problematic:

Well, it was to be expected: after a long wait, WordPress 3.0 got released just when I was on a short holiday. (WordPress admins shouldn't be allowed to take holidays for that exact reason.)

Last month we updated several WCM vendor evaluations, including

There's a debate raging within Twitter about whether traditional blogging platform WordPress is also a CMS

Noted blog package WordPress keeps coming out with maybe more releases than you'd care for, fixing exploits and bugs, but also steadily improving functionality. By comparison, it has been very quiet around Movable Type. That is, until last week, when the long-awaited version 5 was released. So was it worth the wait?

This week we updated our collaboration and social computing vendor evaluations. Specifically, we updated the following reviews

If you're admin of a number of WordPress implementations, I hope you didn't plan anything. Just because, you know, neither did WordPress.

How can we best understand the broad social software and collaboration vendor marketplace? I'd just been pondering that question when

At CMS Watch we evaluate an awful lot of products, and making sense of all this research can be a challenge.

Talking about SharePoint in Copenhagen today and yesterday reminded me of an interesting point

Big Blue recently released its IBM Internet Security Systems X-Force 2008 Mid-Year Trend Statistics report

WordPress version 2.6 was released two weeks ago, and as I reviewed 2.5 for the Enterprise Social Software Report 2008, I was eager to run it through its paces